Light

Episode #883 Quiz

The Maker's Schedule
Date: 2022-08-09 | Length: 1.5 hrs | Episode page at twit.tv

About this episode

NIST’s post-quantum SIKE candidate was broken by KU Leuven researchers using a pure mathematical key-recovery attack based on the 1997 glue-and-split theorem against SIDH elliptic curves. Separately, VirusTotal found 87% of signed malware had valid signatures, and Microsoft fixed Windows 11 VAES-related AES-XTS/GCM data corruption by altering SymCrypt code paths.

Your name and email are stored only in your browser local storage for convenience. They are not retained server-side.

Question 1: Why did the KU Leuven researchers’ break of SIKE matter beyond simply removing one candidate from consideration?
Question 2: What did VirusTotal report about malicious samples that were signed when uploaded since January 2021?
Question 3: Which encryption scenarios were affected by the Windows 11 VAES-related data damage issue described in the episode?
Question 4: What did Steve say about how the three-dumb-routers solution isolates two networks?
Question 5: What was Paul Graham’s practical workaround for supporting founders on a maker’s schedule at Y Combinator?
Cancel